Another nashvegas Update

So something that has been bugging me since the recent release of nashvegas was the lack of handling errors in migration scripts.

There were several issues impeding me being able to handle errant scripts gracefully, by which I mean reporting the error via a sys.exit() call.

I was sub-shelling to manage.py dbshell where I would PIPE the contents of the script to stdin. Turns out that dbshell executes the database client process via os.execvp which as the Python document states:

These functions all execute a new program, replacing the current process; they do not return.

So, obviously, I was not going to get a return code from the underlying call, that I might check and take evasive action.

Because I was getting to the database client indirectly through dbshell, I was unable to control things like setting flags or variables to control the behavior of the database client. So, even if I were to somehow get around the first problem of os.execvp being used, I still would not be able to set the necessary flags needed to get the client to behave how I wanted it to.

Therefore, I decided that I'd just copy the argument building from each of the django.db.backends.*.client modules and execute the client commands directly. This would also give me the ability to fine tune the command line parameters as I needed.

I decided to focus on postgresql because it's my database of choice these days. I learned tonight that if I pass the command line parameter \--set ON_ERROR_STOP=TRUE, that the execution of sql commands stops on error and exits the client with a return code of 3.

So, now, with nashvegas 0.2a1.dev3 and your database set to postgresql, you can rely on errors in migration scripts to abort, given you the ability to fix without recording the migration in the Migration model.

I haven't attempted to figure out how all the other clients work, though they are supported with the same options as found in django.db.backends. So if by default they exit with error status codes then they'll work like mentioned above. However, if they are require additional command line arguments like postgresql did to exhibit similar behavior, then I ask that someone submit a patch and I'll gladly incorporate it.